Cases 61 - 70 of 4,694
Johnson v. Knight et al
as 5:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Kelly Michelle Johnson
Defendant:
Jailer David Knight, Nurse Kristy and Deputy Jailer Jennifer Bounds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Maness et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Clarence Vaughn
Defendant:
Blake Maness, John Michael Hill, David Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro-Mota v. Bobby et al.
as 4:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Santos Castro-Mota
Defendant:
Warden David Bobby, Cousel Master, Counsel Haad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Annabel, II v. Sherman Campbell, et al
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
SHERMAN CAMPBELL, Warden, DAVID MESSER, CHRISTINA BATES and others
Richardson v. Franklin County Corrections Center et al
as 2:2024cv01817
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Richardson
Defendant:
Franklin County Corrections Center, Nurse Linda Doe and Nurse Sandy Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Preston v. Davids et al
as 2:2024cv10997
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Defendant:
John Davids, Leoncie Murkarurinda, David Maranka and others
Tyler v. Hansen et al
as 2:2024cv10980
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyler
Defendant:
Karen Hansen, David Leyton and Chris Swanson
Crawley #230375 v. Hope College et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Walter Crawley #230375
Defendant:
Hope College, Richard Raymond, David Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Rausch
as 2:2024cv02228
Plaintiff:
Michelle P. Hill
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
