Cases 41 - 50 of 142
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01224
Defendant:
Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Bettye Ellen Reding Binkley
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01194
Defendant:
Jack M. Rudolph, Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Helen O. Young
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01145
Defendant:
Altra Federal Credit Union, Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Lorraine E. Neary and others
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01143
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., PRLAP, INC., Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America v. Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv01123
Defendant:
Courtney Maynard Caudill, Additional Rights With Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right of Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee and Nicklas R. Caudill
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America et al v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.21 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00968
Defendant:
Betty D. Maynard, James H. Maynard and An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.21 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Valley Authority and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United State of America et al v. An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.38 Acre of Land, More Or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2018cv00969
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-Of-Way Over 0.38 Acre of Land, More Or Less, in Montgomery County, Tennessee, Peter M. Olson and Additional Rights with Respect to a Preexisting Easement and Right-Of-Way Over Land in Montgomery County, Tennessee
Plaintiff:
United State of America and Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority v. An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.56 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2016cv00025
Defendant:
An Easement and Right-of-Way Over 0.56 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Van Buren County, Tennessee and Melissa C. Rogers
Plaintiff:
United States of America upon the relation and for the use of the Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Santo v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv12896
Plaintiff:
Paul Santo
Defendant:
United States of America, Lorreta E. Lynch, Vanita Gupta and others
USA, et al v. 1.72 Acres Of Land in TN, et al
as 15-5530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel
Defendant - Appellant:
1.72 ACRES OF LAND , MORE OR LESS, IN COFFEE COUNTY, TENNESSEE, JENTRY DAMRON, LINDA DAMRON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
