Cases 21 - 30 of 1,576
Banks v. Williams et al.
as 1:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Jane Doe Williams and Jane Doe Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Hardyman et al.
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Caylene Hardyman and Theresa Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. BMW Financial Services et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jeff Green
Defendant:
BMW Financial Services, Ole Jensen and William E. Sicking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pennell v. Arrowood et al
as 2:2024cv10045
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Pennell
Defendant:
Paul E Arrowood and Bryan L Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Parks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlton B Parks
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Travis R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rudduck et al v. City of Wilmington et al
as 1:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Brett W. Rudduck and Amanda N. Rudduck
Defendant:
City of Wilmington, Scott E. Baker, Ronald Cravens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Pennell v. Arrowood et al
as 1:2024cv10048
Plaintiff:
Sharon Marie Pennell
Defendant:
Paul E Arrowood and Bryan Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Cordova
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Kelsey E. Campbell
Defendant:
Judge Michelle L. Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. Atwell et al.
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Banks, III
Defendant:
Craig Atwell, Darrell Smith and Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Griffin, Jr., et al v. Scott Hunter, et al
as 24-5004
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GRIFFIN, JR. and P & G CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS LLC
Defendant:
SERGEANT SCOTT HUNTER, CHARLES TROTTER, LIEUTENANT SHAWN WILLIAMS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
