Cases 41 - 50 of 467
Sellers et al v. Joyner et al
as 5:2022cv00077
Executor:
Kimmaire Sellers
Defendant:
Kamika Joyner, Sonja Collins, Tyra Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Phizer et al
as 3:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
James Douglas Smith
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, Shelby County Health Director, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. Lee et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tyris L Harvey
Defendant:
Bill Lee, David Rausch, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrew Lovingood v. Monroe County, TN, et al
as 22-5022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW JOSTEN LOVINGOOD
Defendant / Appellee:
MONROE COUNTY, TN, DERRICK GRAVES and BILL JOHNSON
Whiteaker v. Kuspa et al
as 2:2022cv10011
Plaintiff:
Christopher Whiteaker
Defendant:
Joseph G. Kuspa, Zoey Kuspa, Bill Colovos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Clervrain et al v. Madden et al
as 5:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Ronaldo Jean, Brandko, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Madden, Jon Husted, Dave Yost and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grady v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00891
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Grady, Jr.
Defendant:
Bill B. Lee, David B. Rausch, Herbert H. Slatery, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Starnes v. Gates et al
as 7:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Howard Randall Starnes, II
Defendant:
Bill Gates and Ed Macory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins et al v. Spurlock et al
as 3:2021cv00863
Plaintiff:
James L. Adkins, Jr. and Adam Robert Williams
Defendant:
Bill Spurlock and Does 1 - 100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
E. v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00835
Plaintiff:
L. E.
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Penny Schwinn, Tennessee State Board of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
