Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Troendly et al v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., et al
as 5:2010cv02449
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. , Heather Holcomb and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Betty Troendly and Edward Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laury v. Vantifflin et al
as 1:2010cv13366
Plaintiff:
Leon Laury, III
Defendant:
Nathan Vantifflin, Chad Brooks, Ian Davies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Millan v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 3:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Richard Millan
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00196
Plaintiff:
Britany Eubank Edwards
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Andrew Albertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Freeman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc et al
as 1:2009cv00324
Plaintiff:
Ralph K Freeman
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and William Henry Walker, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Profitt et al v. Laden et al
as 3:2009cv00784
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Profitt, Delicate Details, Divine Solution and others
Defendant:
Asa Bin Laden, Central State Hospital, Kroger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
McLendon v. Wal-Mart Stores et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Christine S. McLendon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores and War Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Gaines v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2009cv12909
Plaintiff:
Opal Gaines
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Civil Rights
Davenport v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
as 3:2009cv00225
Plaintiff:
Karen Davenport
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Beams v. Wal-Mart et al
as 3:2009cv00096
Plaintiff:
Brent Beams
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
