Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rashad v. Ryder System, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Rashad
Defendant:
Ryder System, Inc., Visionary Sleep, LLC and Gustafson's Furniture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hill v. State Farm et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony B. Hill
Defendant:
State Farm, TDCI, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryder v. Big Walnut Local Schools
as 2:2022cv01377
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ryder
Defendant:
Big Walnut Local Schools
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01104
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tawny Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Bret R. Kelly et al v. The University of Michigan et al
as 4:2018cv12823
Plaintiff:
Corey Foster, Michigan Nurses Association, April Smith and others
Defendant:
Denise Ilitch, Andrea Fischer Newman, Jesus Cepero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Imelmann v. Corizon et al
as 2:2018cv11100
Defendant:
Corizon , Dorene J Smith, Rhonda L. Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Imelmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Caspar et al v. Snyder et al
as 2:2014cv11499
Plaintiff:
Marsha Caspar , Glenna DeJong , Clint McCormack and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , Maura Corrigan , Phil Stoddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Americans for Liberty at The University of Michigan v. Coleman et al
as 5:2013cv15193
Plaintiff:
Young Americans for Liberty at The University of Michigan
Defendant:
Mary Sue Coleman, E. Royster Harper, Susan Pile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Beden v. United Auto Workers Local 9699, et al
as 11-2109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD BEDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED AUTO WORKERS LOCAL 9699 and RYDER LOGISTICS
Beden v. United Auto Workers Local 9699 et al
as 2:2010cv14851
Plaintiff:
Donald Beden
Defendant:
United Auto Workers Local 9699 and Ryder Logistics
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
