Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Ayers v. Buford et al
as 2:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Ayers
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Officer Avalos, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughan v. Thomas et al
as 2:2023cv02671
Plaintiff:
Beau Cameron Vaughan
Defendant:
Mary Thomas, Mr. Byrd, Mr. West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McElhaney v. WASHINGTON et al
as 5:2021cv13021
Plaintiff:
Randy Allen McElhaney
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, John Christiansen, Dr. RUSSELL SCABBO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton v. Oaks et al
as 2:2021cv11614
Plaintiff:
Sherwin T. Shelton
Defendant:
Magen Oaks, Michael Desco, Kaelie Lewis and others
Gonzalez v. Shelton
as 6:2018cv00265
Defendant:
Tommy W. Shelton
Plaintiff:
Sadiel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. Unicoi County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00139
Defendant:
Barbra Scalf, Kenny Jones, Darrel Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Williams, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roker v. Moore et al
as 2:2017cv02486
Plaintiff:
Damond Julian Roker
Defendant:
Robert L. Moore, A. Barnett, Shelby County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnett v. Oldham et al
as 2:2017cv02292
Plaintiff:
Robert Burnett
Defendant:
Bill Oldham, Robert Moore, McGhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Powell v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 17-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL POWELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director Michigan Department of Corrections, K. ROXANNE MCKEE, Deputy Director, THOMAS OSIER, Assistant Mental Health Director and others
Powell #484234 v. Washington et al
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon Powell #484234
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, K. McKee, Thomas Osier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
