Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. D/B/A BULLET PROOF DIESEL v. Mike's Bulletproof Diesel et al
as 1:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
Neal Technologies, Inc. doing business as Bullet Proof Diesel
Defendant:
Mike's Bulletproof Diesel and Mike Lewis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Microcanner, LLC v. Micro Can Limited et al
as 1:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
Microcanner, LLC
Defendant:
Micro Can Limited and Neal H. Knapp, LLC doing business as Brew-Bev Consulting & Equipment Sales
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
BR IP Holder LLC et al v. Mike & Ray's Ice Cream, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv13131
Plaintiff:
Baskin Robbins Franchising LLC and BR IP Holder LLC
Defendant:
Mike & Ray's Ice Cream, Inc. and Rosenthal Neal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Bacik, et al. v. Neale, et al.
as 1:2019cv01111
Plaintiff:
John A. Bacik and Image Line Design Incorporated
Defendant:
Parkview Homes, Tucker Neale and Parkview Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
NEAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CHOATE et al
as 2:2019cv02186
Plaintiff:
NEAL TECHNOLOGIES,INC
Defendant:
CASS J. CHOATE and ABRIANNA CHOATE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Hayes v. Crutchfield et al
as 2:2015cv02572
Plaintiff:
Sammy O'Neal Hayes
Defendant:
Tony Mac Crutchfield, David Whitelock and John Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Downing v. Clements et al
as 1:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Neal Downing
Defendant:
Brian Clements, Studio Threesixty, LLC , Adam Rider and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
TAS Rights Management, LLC v. Various John Does et al
as 3:2013cv00170
Plaintiff:
TAS Rights Management, LLC
Defendant:
Nicholas Daley, Edwin Cooper, Sam Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Marsha Neal Studio, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv02226
Plaintiff:
Marsha Neal Studio, LLC and Marsha Minutella
Defendant:
Michaels Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
