Cases 11 - 20 of 564
Fontana, Sr. v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L. Fontana, Sr.
Defendant:
William Lee, David B Rousch and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roseman, Sr. v. Grant et al
as 2:2024cv10830
Plaintiff:
John L. Roseman, Sr.
Defendant:
Nanci J. Grant, Shalina D. Kumar, Nathan Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bunker et al v. Mackinac, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bunker, Steven Hetzner, Estate of John Nelson Massaway, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mackinac, County of, Jennifer Goudreau and Nora A. Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Peterson v. Peterson et al
as 2:2023cv13040
Plaintiff:
Alissa Peterson
Defendant:
Uriah Z Peterson, Sr and Diane Rappleye
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
