Cases 21 - 30 of 1,396
Jones v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Leo Lamont Jones
Defendant:
Rutherford County and James Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pendleton v. Kennedy et al
as 3:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Eric C. Pendleton
Defendant:
Randy Kennedy, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Andra Hedrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Glass House Hospitality, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kamri Jones
Defendant:
Glass House Hospitality, LLC and Keith Glass
Jones v. Swistak & Levine, PC
as 2:2024cv10515
Plaintiff:
Kirmeth Jones
Defendant:
Swistak & Levine, PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Ashley et al v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Katherine Ann Ashley, Katelyn Phillips, Deannia Keith and others
Defendant:
Coltan Jones, Sheriff Michael Reagon and Fentress County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 6851 Disclosure of Intimate Images
Frasure et al v. City of Wyoming et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Joe Frasure, Lisa Fisher and Joseph Frasure
Defendant:
City of Wyoming, Patrolman Drew Jones, Police Officer Jordan Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
