Cases 21 - 30 of 155
Miller El et al v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2022cv00686
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller El and Nathaniel D. Taylor El
Defendant:
State of Ohio, Cuyahoga Cleveland, David Matia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Apex-El v. O'Malley
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff:
Quila Apex-El
Defendant:
Judge Thomas O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Lusa et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2021cv00813
Plaintiff:
Yananta Isi Chito Lusa, Wild Fire, Hakeem Shabazz-El and others
Defendant:
Rutherford County, Donna Scott Davenport and Lynn Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murrell v. Craig and Landreth Cars et al
as 3:2021cv00336
Plaintiff:
Durand Edward Murrell and Rasheed Malik Moorese El
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA and Craig and Landreth Cars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murrell et al v. Cars et al
as 3:2021cv00247
Plaintiff:
Durand Edward Murrell and Rasheed Malik Moorese El
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA, Craig Cars, Landreth Cars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Richardson (El Bey) v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Defendant:
Fayette County, Amy P. Wierch, TN Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Erique Jermaine Richardson (El Bey)
El v. Perez et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Aysia Marie Perez and Eric Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Rambo El Blackhawk Tribe doing business as Randy Tyrease Joy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv13409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
