Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Lakendus Cole et al v. City Of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2013cv02117
Defendant:
City Of Memphis, Tennessee, Robert Forbert, Samuel Hearn and others
Plaintiff:
Lakendus Cole and Leon Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Latoya Edmonds v. Detroit Public School
as 13-1202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATOYA EDMONDS, Individually and as Next Friend of Minor, K.S.
Defendant - Appellee:
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, WILMA TAYLOR-COSTEN, RACHEL ANDERSON and others
Joslin et al v. Metro Nashville/Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv01284
Plaintiff:
Ronrico D. Joslin, Walter L. Joslin and Mary J. Mitchell
Defendant:
Metro Nashville/Davidson County, Tennessee, Andre Starling, Julian Pirtle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Detroit Public Schools et al
as 2:2012cv10023
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools, Wilma Constance-Taylor, Rachel Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Latoya Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roger v. Murchison et al
as 1:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
David Edmond Rogers
Defendant:
Blake F Murchison and Rebecca Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Farakhan v. Edmond
as 5:2011cv01020
Plaintiff:
Khadijah R. Farakhan
Defendant:
Edmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-5105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Clem v. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
as 5:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Edmond C. Clem
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clem v. Bush
as 5:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Edmond C. Clem
Defendant:
George W. Bush
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
