Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,396
Ragless v. Jones et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv10050
Plaintiff: Kyle Ragless
Defendant: Christopher Jones and Michael Olsaver
Douglas v. Doe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff: Reco Recardo Douglas
Defendant: John Doe, Bobby Jones, Steve Godwyn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. Villilio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04202
Plaintiff: April Clark
Defendant: Susan Villilio, ADAMH Board of Franklin County, Erica Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Matthew Jones v. Perryville Police
as 23-6112
Plaintiff: MATTHEW JONES
Defendant: PERRYVILLE POLICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00340
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Customer Experience Center, et al
as 23-6085
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE CENTER, aka Whirlpool cXc, PATTON MUSICK, MONICA J. CULPEPPER and others
Mawule Tepe v. USA, et al
as 23-6086
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CURTIS L. COLLIER, United States District Court Judge, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, United States District Court Judge and others
Mawule Tepe v. Whirlpool Corporation, et al
as 23-6093
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION, MARK JONES and DAKIA TAYLOR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6097
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Whyte v. Bell et al
as 3:2023cv01321
Plaintiff: Darrell Ricardo Whyte
Defendant: Brenna K. Bell, Jennings H, Jones, Donna Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?