Cases 71 - 80 of 565
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00440
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. Oakland, County of et al
as 4:2022cv10559
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Martin
Defendant:
Oakland, County of, Michael J. Bouchard, Wellpath, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ian Folmar, Sr. v. Ohio Department of Human Resources, et al
as 22-3221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IAN L. FOLMAR, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, TRUMBULL COUNTY, OH CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY and STARK COUNTY, OH CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
Laveris Townsend, Sr. v. Hamilton County, TN
as 22-5193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAVERIS TOWNSEND, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
HAMILTON COUNTY, TN
Holland v. Doddamani et al
as 2:2022cv10383
Plaintiff:
Cory Holland, Sr.
Defendant:
Sunita Doddamani and Eric Smith
Robinson v. Higgins
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Gary Robinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Jerry N Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Yarbrough v. Tooele County Detention Center et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
Mr. Aaron A Yarbrough, Sr. and Aaron A. Yarborough
Defendant:
Tooele County Detention Center, Hon. David Nuffer, Attorney Vernon Stejskal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Townsend, Sr v. Hamilton County, TN
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Laveris Townsend, Sr, Laveris Townsend, Jr, LaTonya Townsend and others
Defendant:
Hamilton County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chapman v. Mansfield Municipal Court et al
as 1:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Dwaine J. Chapman, Sr.
Defendant:
Mansfield Municipal Court and Judge Frank Ardis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
