Civil Rights Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 81 - 90 of 118
Luis v. Zang et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00629
Defendant: Awareness Technologies, Inc., Mike Osborne, Peter Fuhrman and others
Petitioner: Hill Ward Henderson, Scott J Stitt, James E Arnold and others
Plaintiff: Javier Luis
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
El Ssayed v. Western Michigan University et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00797
Plaintiff: Hatem El Ssayed
Defendant: Western Michigan University , Muhamed Sultan , Carla Koretsky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. St Francis Hosp. et al
as 2:2012cv02381
Plaintiff: Jack M. Clark
Defendant: St Francis Hosp. and Carla Kirkland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. University of Kentucky Comprehensive Assessment & Training Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv00123
Plaintiff: Anthony Brown
Defendant: University of Kentucky Comprehensive Assessment & Training Services, Vincent Geremia, Angela Estep and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv11638
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00022
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nancy Woods, et al v. Linnie Willis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-3029
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee: NANCY WOODS, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants, CAULENE FULLER, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants and CARLA MCCULLOUGH, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant: LINNIE WILLIS, personally and in her official capacity as Executive Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority, MARGARET MIRACOLA, personally and in her official capacity as Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Choice Voucher Program and CANDACE RENNER, personally and in her official capacity as Hearing Officer, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority
Hall v. Juvenille Court et al
as 1:2012cv00035
Plaintiff: Kanonie Hall
Defendant: Juvenille Court, City of Cleveland Economic Development, Cleveland Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nancy Woods, et al v. Linnie Willis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-4419
Plaintiff - Appellant: NANCY WOODS, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants, CAULENE FULLER, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants and CARLA MCCULLOUGH, in her own right and as representatives of all similarly situated Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program participants
Defendant - Appellee: LINNIE WILLIS, personally and in her official capacity as Executive Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority, MARGARET MIRACOLA, personally and in her official capacity as Director, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Choice Voucher Program and CANDACE RENNER, personally and in her official capacity as Hearing Officer, Lucas Metropolitan Housing Authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00088
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?