Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Chatman v. Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
as 2:2022cv03277
Plaintiff:
Sherri C. Chatman
Defendant:
Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sellers et al v. Joyner et al
as 5:2022cv00077
Executor:
Kimmaire Sellers
Defendant:
Kamika Joyner, Sonja Collins, Tyra Chatman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Chatman et al v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2020cv00532
Plaintiff:
Patrick Chatman, A.K.C. and Lakeesha Lavon Chatman
Defendant:
Robertson County, Tennessee and Deputy Heather Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America et al v. Kenny/Obayashi V et al
as 5:2019cv02221
Plaintiff:
Local 894 Laborers' International Union of North America, Carrington Chatman, Andre Dabney and others
Defendant:
Kenny Construction Company, Kenny/Obayashi V and Obayashi Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chatman v. Kentwood, City of et al
as 1:2019cv00065
Plaintiff:
Rene Chatman
Defendant:
Darrin Cline and Kentwood, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
