Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Estes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv11933
Plaintiff:
Christina Estes
Defendant:
Blue Care Network, d/b/a Bcn, Blue Care Network Doing business as BCN and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aubrey Murray v. City of Elizabethton, TN, et al
as 23-5323
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AUBREY S. MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF ELIZABETHTON, TN and BARRY CARRIER
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL ESTES
Assily v. Cuyahoga Community College District et al
as 1:2023cv00629
Plaintiff:
Rania Assily
Defendant:
Cuyahoga Community College District, Kimberly Johnson, Alexander Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Whitley v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv11995
Plaintiff:
PR of Est. Edna Whitley
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Gregory Skipper, George Whitinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. City of Elizabethton, TN et al (TV1)
as 2:2021cv00123
Plaintiff:
Aubrey S Murray
Defendant:
Elizabethton, TN, City of, Daniel Estes and Barry Carrier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 er
Patterson et al v. Beacon Hill Village Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00912
Defendant:
David Floyd, Brenda Estes, Gary Estes and others
Plaintiff:
Janet Patterson and Harold Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
