Cases 1 - 10 of 675
Kelly v. Advance Financial et al
as 3:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Henderson Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
Advance Financial and Wendy's of Bowling Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Lonnita Anderson
Defendant:
Wendy's of Bowling Green Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon et al v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
I. H., S. H., Teresa M. Harmon and others
Defendant:
Hon. Lori Goodwin, Stephanie Willis, David Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Brown et al v. Greene County Vocational School District Board of Education
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Joy Brown, J. B. and Jacob Brown
Defendant:
Greene County Vocational School, Superintendent David Deskins, Maurice Harden and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Green v. BMW Financial Services et al
as 4:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jeff Green
Defendant:
BMW Financial Services, Ole Jensen and William E. Sicking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sharp v. The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv00174
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Sharp, Jr.
Defendant:
The Bowling Green Kentucky Police Department, Stephen Irwin and Joshua Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
