Cases 1 - 10 of 29
White et al v. Hamilton County Tennessee et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
James Christopher White and Andrea White
Defendant:
Hamilton County Tennessee, Jim Hammond, Quality Correctional Healthcare of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reeners v. Jouvence et al
as 3:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jayson Reeners
Defendant:
Michelle Landry Jouvence, Mary Guneug, Pascal Claude Jouvence and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Auk et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10897
Plaintiff:
Bryan Auk and Anthony Auk
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Alonzo Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Correnti v. City of Cleveland et al.
as 1:2021cv02372
Plaintiff:
John Correnti
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, John Does and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01025
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore v. Franklin County, Ohio et al.
as 3:2020cv00305
Defendant:
LPN Brooke N New-Berry, Marsha K Burgess, John Doe Employees #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Gwen Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01569
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Rudd v. MINACT, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02715
Plaintiff:
Kristy Rudd
Defendant:
MINACT, Inc., John Doe Individuals 1, 2, and 3 and John Doe Corporations 1, 2, and 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cull v. Carl et al
as 2:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Kelli Ann Cull
Defendant:
Terry Carl, Katherine Wells, Sarah Seitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
