Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 4:2024cv10511
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Police Department Sterling Heights, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kyle Jordan Timco
Defendant:
Sterling Heights Police Department, Phillip Descamps, Mario Bastianelli, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Havela et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mason, Anita Demyers Hatchel, Guy Havela and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Edgar Muir v. Marion County Government et al
as 1:2020cv00310
Defendant:
Marion County Government, 12th Judicial Drug & Violent Crime Task Force, Charlie Rittenberry and others
Plaintiff:
William Edgar Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Muir v. Danner et al
as 2:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kemisha Michelle-Ann Muir
Defendant:
Chris Mace, Ray Smith, Jordan Danner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5385
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
