Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Cerrato et al v. City of Memphis, Tennessee et al
as 2:2023cv02602
Plaintiff:
Henry Paz Cerrato, Pedro Gomez, Edgardo Flores Sequeiros and others
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Tennessee, Cerelyn Davis, R. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ramos-Gomez v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jilmar Ramos-Gomez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Ramos-Gomez v. Adducci et al
as 1:2020cv00969
Defendant:
Richard Groll, Rebecca Adducci, Matthew Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Jilmar Ramos-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Ramos v. Lorain County Children Services et al
as 1:2020cv01388
Defendant:
Michelle Hunt, Todd Esterburg, Nancy Griffiths and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ramos, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos-Gomez v. ADDUCCI et al
as 2:2019cv13475
Defendant:
REBECCA J. ADDUCCI, Matthew Lopez and Derek Klifman
Plaintiff:
Jilmar Ramos-Gomez
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Barley v. Ramos et al
as 3:2019cv00510
Defendant:
Estate of Izeyha Carr, Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government, John and/or Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kerry Barley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ramos et al v. Lorain County Children Services et al
as 1:2018cv01018
Plaintiff:
Marcus Ramos and Lametra Phillips
Defendant:
Lorain County Children Services and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
