Cases 131 - 140 of 100,342
Perry #775224 v. Michigan Parole Board, The et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Petitioner:
Brian Keith Perry #775224
Respondent:
Chris King, Michigan Parole Board, The and Michigan Department of Corrections, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keene v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Mario Keene
Respondent:
Shawn Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Krusley v. Mazza
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Douglas Krusley
Respondent:
Kevin R. Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00639
Petitioner:
Zachary John Kennedy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Morgan #313765 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Gary Morgan #313765
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Clark and Unknown Reddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #225908 v. Washington et al
as 1:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
John Robert Smith #225908
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Unknown Party #1 and Unknown Party #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. USA
as 1:2024cv01044
Petitioner:
Franklin M. Bryant
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rose v. May
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
John R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seals v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03360
Petitioner:
Daniel Seals
Respondent:
Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whittenberg v. USA
as 3:2024cv00273
Petitioner:
Gage Whittenberg
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
