Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 2:2020cv03301
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. DeWine et al
as 5:2020cv00981
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections and Governor Mike DeWine
Plaintiff:
Rubin Williams, James Goodson, Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nelson #630619 v. Matthew et al
as 1:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Unknown Simia, Unknown Williamson, Unknown Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Luster Ray Nelson #630619, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Streeval et al
as 0:2019cv00124
Defendant:
Isaac, Ian Connors, Angela P. Dunbar and others
Plaintiff:
James L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jenkins v. Batie et al
as 2:2019cv12900
Defendant:
Timothy P. Connors, Elgin Batie, Yirdsay Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Van Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins #172475 v. Batie et al
as 1:2019cv00772
Plaintiff:
Van Jenkins #172475
Defendant:
Timothy P. Connors, Elgin Batie, Yirdsay Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker #132271 v. Connor et al
as 2:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Unknown Mankee, Unknown Kautz and D. Connor
Plaintiff:
L T Tucker #132271
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moler v. Lawson et al
as 6:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Angela Dunbar, Christopher Mabe, Ms. J. Free and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Connor v. USA
as 2:2019cv10419
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Clifford Anthony Connor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clark v. John Does sued as "The Unknown Members of the Utilization Review Committee"
as 6:2019cv00011
Defendant:
R. Jones, Ian Connors, Dankqua Vibete and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
