Cases 11 - 20 of 950
Marshall v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2024cv10872
Plaintiff:
Calvin Eunice Marshall
Defendant:
Rewerts, John Doe, West and others
Cain v. Davids
as 5:2024cv10684
Petitioner:
Brandon Lewis Cain
Respondent:
John David and John Davids
Jones v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Bradley Jones
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, Shawn McKenzie, Judy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Browder, Jr. v. Hopkins County, KY, et al
as 24-5177
Plaintiff:
JOE ALEXANDER BROWDER, JR. and HOPKINS COUNTY, KENTUCKY
Defendant:
MIKE LEWIS, DOCTOR SCOTT WILSON, WEST KENTUCKY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, LLC and others
Hollis v. Holloway et al
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Horace Hollis
Defendant:
James M. Holloway, Eugene Lewis, Cpl. f/n/u White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Hightower
Respondent:
Commissioner Cookie Crews, Branch Manager Jennifer Travis, Warden Kevin Mazza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Lewis v. Elliott
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tucker Lewis
Defendant:
Jailer Kelli Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson #807918 v. Lewis et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Kiyel Justin Johnson #807918
Defendant:
Patricia Lewis and Tyler Kangas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
