Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Joshua Dunlap v. Robin Fish, et al
as 24-5010
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA DUNLAP
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER ROBIN FISH, CORPORAL LAKEIA WELLS, SERGEANT PEARSON and others
Jennifer Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical, et al
as 23-6073
Petitioner / Appellant:
JENNIFER WIDENER LARSEN
Respondent / Appellee:
WELLNESS PATH MEDICAL, SHERIFF STEVE REAMS, WCSO and SHERIFF F/N/U HEYER, LCSO
Cain v. Cross et al
as 5:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Ofc Cross, Calloway County, WKCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis #368425 v. Brown et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
Chris Davis #368425
Defendant:
Unknown Brown, Unknown Story, Wendy Jamros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larsen v. Wellness Path Medical et al
as 3:2023cv01155
Petitioner:
Jennifer Widener Larsen
Respondent:
Wellness Path Medical, Sheriff Steve Reams and Sheriff f/n/u Heyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodgers v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
Tracy Rodgers
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Jane/John Doe, Ms. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Artis et al
as 2:2023cv12570
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Collins
Defendant:
Fredeane Artis, Mark McDonald, Woods and others
Chaverst v. Well Path Medical et al
as 4:2023cv11513
Plaintiff:
Terrance Glenn Chaverst
Defendant:
Well Path Medical, Victoria Janowiecki, Lisa Harvey and others
Hill v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2023cv00406
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Genesis Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
