Cases 21 - 30 of 163
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5575
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
William Davis, Jr. v. United States Penitentiary McCreary, et al
as 22-5565
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY MCCREARY, AI UNIT MANAGER CLARK, COUNSELOR KEITH and others
Davis v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
William Scott Davis, Jr, Warden Civile, Director of NCR FBOP Barb Von Blanckness and others
Defendant:
USP McCreary, AI Unit Manager Clark, Counselor Keith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Gonzalez-Campos v. USA
as 2:2022cv00310
Petitioner:
Jose Daniel Gonzalez-Campos
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzalez #967783 v. Maki
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gonzalez #967783
Defendant:
Unknown Maki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Warren County Regional Jail
as 1:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jeff Gonzalez
Defendant:
Warren County Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galindo-Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02651
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Calvin Galindo-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Truss v. Griener et al
as 2:2020cv11802
Defendant:
Subrine Aiken, M. Griener, Jodi Nekato and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Flynn Truss, Jr.
Gonzalez v. Owens
as 2:2020cv02106
Respondent:
Angela M. Owens
Petitioner:
Ricardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
