Cases 21 - 30 of 215
Withers v. Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company et al
as 3:2017cv01229
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Withers
Defendant:
Beecken Petty O'Keefe and Company, Corizon, LLC, Calvin Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Clark County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Lamarkus T. Jones
Defendant:
Clark County, Kentucky , Frank Doyle , Brett Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. United States Public Defenders et al
as 1:2016cv00512
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
United States Public Defenders, Kunya Kenta, Joe Cecil Rhea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2016cv01402
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603, Charles Johnson, Dabon Reed #801306 and others
Defendant:
Willie Smith and Additional Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delk v. Hardeman County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
Delk and Adrian Deshun Delk
Defendant:
Hardeman County Correctional Facility, Grady Perry, Thelma Bumpas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrance Pettis v. USA
as 16-3973
Petitioner - Appellant:
TERRANCE PETTIS
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Williams v. Petty et al
as 3:2016cv02172
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Williams
Defendant:
Justin Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Correctional Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Rodney T. Patterson
Defendant:
Correctional Corporation of America, S.C.C.C., S.C.O. Harville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pettis v. USA
as 3:2016cv01386
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Terrance Pettis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Maisano v. Armenta et al
as 3:2015cv01450
Plaintiff:
Dale Maisano
Defendant:
Christine Armenta, Chris Johnson, Beecken, Petty, O'Keefe & Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
