Cases 41 - 50 of 1,908
Scott v. Embry et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Randi Thomas Embry, Luke Whittaker, Shawn Embry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Arnold v. Hauswirth et al.
as 4:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Ralph Arnold
Defendant:
Kyle A. Hauswirth, Karrie Hupka, Unit Manager Joe Remish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blocker v. Wriggelsworth et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Corey Blocker
Defendant:
Scott Wriggelsworth and Ingham County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Whittaker et al
as 1:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Seth Whittaker and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. USA
as 2:2024cv10392
Petitioner:
Terry L. Scott, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Scott v. Browder et al
as 1:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Antonio Browder and Logan County Sherrif's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Garcia et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Pamela Garcia and Logan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Mintchie et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Robert Mintchie and Logan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
