Cases 41 - 50 of 305
Martinez v. Watson
as 3:2022cv02227
Petitioner:
Michael Martinez and Nicholas Martinez
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00436
Petitioner:
Preston Andrew Watson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Schenk et al v. McKee et al
as 1:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Breana Schenk, Everitt McKee, Emmitt McKee and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Kelsey Delylah Schenk-McKee
Defendant:
Elijah McKee, Paul A Thomas, Danny Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
State of Ohio v. Watson
as 1:2022cv00707
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
State of Ohio v. Watson
as 1:2022cv00708
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio
Defendant:
Michael Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brundage v. Watson
as 5:2022cv02086
Petitioner:
Scott Brundage
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Watson
as 2:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
Ramone Wright
Defendant:
Michael H Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Watson
as 4:2022cv01958
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Palmer
Respondent:
Warden Thomas Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson #486299 v. Rees et al
as 1:2022cv00957
Plaintiff:
Anthony Watson #486299
Defendant:
Unknown Rees, Unknown Montoya and Unknown Cassel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheldon v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Sheldon and Derrick Sheldon
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., fnu Shenafield, fnu Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
