Cases 51 - 60 of 437
Woods v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 2:2022cv04420
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Aramark Correctional Services and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morseman v. Helton et al
as 4:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Morseman
Defendant:
Brittny Helton, Sergeant Brandon Lampton, Kimberly Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Shelby County Sheriff Jail / 201 Poplar Ave. et al
as 2:2022cv02848
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Defendant:
Shelby County Sheriff Jail / 201 Poplar Ave., Floyd Bonner, Lt. Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris #156444 v. White et al
as 1:2022cv01123
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Morris #156444
Defendant:
R. White, Unknown King, Unknown Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Campbell et al
as 4:2022cv12594
Plaintiff:
DeJerry Powell
Defendant:
Sherman Campbell, G. Stephenson, Mt. Morris Police Twp. and others
Morris Sr. v. Huffman
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
Mary K. Huffman, David Merrell, Christopher Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris Sr. v. Turner
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
J. David Turner, Michael L. Tucker, Jeffery M. Welbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris Sr. v. Warden, North Central Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2022cv03461
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
Warden, North Central Correctional Complex, L. Shuler, R. West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samuel Calhoun v. P. Morris, et al
as 22-1795
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAMUEL EUGENE CALHOUN
Defendant / Appellee:
P. MORRIS, Correctional Officer with the Michigan Department of Corrections in her personal capacity and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
