Cases 51 - 60 of 1,905
Scott v. Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv00352
Petitioner:
Curtis Scott
Respondent:
Warden, Mansfield Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Lentz v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10198
Plaintiff:
Gary Lentz
Defendant:
MDOC, Heidi Washington, Aleksandra Wilanowski and others
Wilson v. Scott County
as 3:2024cv00024
Petitioner:
Eric Wilson
Respondent:
Scott County
Defendant:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Dye
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Cameron Dye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Ashby et al
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Tina Ashby, Kia Beard, Patricia Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp v. Wrigglesworth
as 1:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Delmar Sharray Sharp
Respondent:
Scott Wrigglesworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Scott v. Fox et al
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Cody Fox, Antonio Browder and Logan County Sherrif Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Versace Alan Scott
Defendant:
Joey Wright, Logan County Sheriff Stephen Stratton and Deptuty Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tubbs-Chandler v. Gallion et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Tubbs-Chandler
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
