Cases 81 - 90 of 229
Gresham #272603 v. Gauderer et al
as 1:2019cv00802
Defendant:
Darren Woodley, N. Bruner, Ernst Christian Gauderer and others
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyd et al v. State of Kentucky et al
as 5:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Christian County, Kentucky, State of Kentucky and City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Torell DeWayne Boyd and Daniel Shawn Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. USA
as 1:2019cv00703
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Christian Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Robertson v. Christian County Jail
as 4:2019cv00094
Petitioner:
Douglas Robertson
Respondent:
Christian County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Williams v. Oak Grove Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00089
Defendant:
Christian County Circuit Court System, Oak Grove Police Department, Officer C. Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulkarim v. Ledford et al
as 3:2019cv00447
Defendant:
Christian Johnson, Stephen Chandler, Robert D. Fondron and others
Plaintiff:
Noreeldeen Abdulkarim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole v. Hart et al
as 5:2019cv00065
Defendant:
Lieutenit Melissa A. Rogers, Fredrick Rogers, Correctional Officer J. Earls and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanio L. Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Rives et al
as 5:2019cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marque Harris
Defendant:
Christian County Jail Staff, Deputy Hurt, Lt. Rives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartley v. Jenny Stewart Medical Center et al
as 5:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Deputy Jailer Newby, Dr. Matthew Johnson, Christian County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bartley and Christopher Douglas Bartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. Garza
as 7:2019cv00001
Respondent:
F. Garza
Petitioner:
Christian Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
