Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Michael Thornton v. Wellpath Healthcare, et al
as 24-5553
Plaintiff: MICHAEL THORNTON
Defendant: WELLPATH HEALTHCARE, W. WHITNEY, APN, SRINATH KAMINENI, M.D. and others
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Michael Thornton
Defendant: Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Cecil Bennett
Defendant: Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flenner v. Forshey
as 4:2023cv02292
Petitioner: Cecil Lee Flenner
Respondent: Warden Jay Forshey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burnett #200640 v. Washington et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00896
Plaintiff: Michael Angelo Burnett #200640
Defendant: Heidi Washington, Grand Prairie Wellpath, Margaret Ouellette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dykes-Bey v. Cecil et al
as 1:2023cv11998
Plaintiff: Robert L. Dykes-Bey
Defendant: Emily Cecil, Kelley Wellman, Mary Velarde and others
Salyers v. Robey
as 4:2023cv00045
Petitioner: Cecil W. Salyers
Respondent: Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Valentine et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff: Morris Richard Edwards
Defendant: Anna Valentine, Wellpath Health Care Services, Christina Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Clark et al
as 3:2022cv00555
Plaintiff: Matthew Cecil Franklin
Defendant: Dwayne Clark and Greg Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cecil Salyers v. Amy Robey
as 22-5319
Petitioner / Appellant: CECIL W. SALYERS
Respondent / Appellee: AMY ROBEY, Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?