Cases 1 - 10 of 1,738
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
England v. USA
as 6:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher England
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kevin Giles v. Christopher Swanson, et al
as 24-1473
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R. SWANSON, Sheriff, KAY [UNKNOWN], Nurse, LIZ [UNKNOWN], Nurse and others
Bowman v. Dennis et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Hywel Channing Bowman
Defendant:
Jeb Dennis and Christopher Ahlers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General and CHRISTOPHER SZCZYGIEL, F.B.I. Special Agent
Christopher Peyton v. Daniel Akers
as 24-5505
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER PEYTON
Respondent:
DANIEL AKERS, Warden
Strong #834816 v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Christopher Strong #834816
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Unknown Cook, Unknown Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDavid et al v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Logan McDavid, Perry Anthony Herring, Jr., Vincent Tyler Matthews and others
Defendant:
Anderson County, TN and Anderson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Middletown Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
City of Middletown Police Department, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Hatfield et al
as 3:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewan Robertson
Defendant:
Gary Hatfield and Amber L. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
