Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Tompkins v. Barber et al
as 2:2023cv12637
Plaintiff:
Boston Jermaine Tompkins and Boston J. Tompkins
Defendant:
Barber, Riley, Blain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tompkins #518783 v. Barber et al
as 1:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Boston Jermaine Tompkins #518783
Defendant:
Unknown Barber, Unknown Riley, Unknown Blain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman, Sr. v. State of Indiana, The et al
as 3:2023cv00968
Petitioner:
Albert D.M. Chatman, Sr.
Respondent:
State of Indiana, The, (f/n/u) Reddman, (f/n/u) Olmstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sango v. Godley et al
as 2:2023cv12283
Plaintiff:
Robert Sango
Defendant:
Godley, Verhaar, Drake and others
Kyle et al v.
as 1:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Lowell H Kyle, Sr, Colton Drake Clingan, Larry Leland Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schrimer v. Powell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Tyler Schrimer and Tyler Schirmer
Defendant:
Powell County Detention Center, Powell County Sheriff Department, George Nester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kolbucaj #683653 v. Pants et al
as 1:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
Gjin Kolbucaj #683653
Defendant:
Unknown Pants, Unknown Schimke, Unknown Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drake
Defendant:
Adult Parole Authority, Warden A. C. Smith and Parole Officer Danielle Lesko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramone Drake v. USA
as 5:2021cv00132
Petitioner:
Garry Sean Ramone Drake, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00358
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
