Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Ward v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00698
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and Amber L. Phillips
Plaintiff:
Leah Joy Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Bolinger et al.
as 5:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
DeAerre Smith and Smurk
Defendant:
Joshua Bolinger, Deputy McCutcheon, Becky McCutcheon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Reynolds, Jr. v. Tetrick
as 4:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Allen L. Reynolds, Jr.
Defendant:
Marsha Joy Tetrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Joy v. USA
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
James J. Joy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Melvin King, III v. Ta'Kisha Fitzgerald, et al
as 23-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN R. KING, III
Defendant / Appellee:
TA'KISHA FITZGERALD, STEVEN W. SWORD, RANDALL E. NICHOLS and others
Harris v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00581
Plaintiff:
Joy Harris
Defendant:
Metropolitan Government of Nashville Davidson County, Tennessee and Jason Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyler v. Maze et al
as 0:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Tyler
Defendant:
Irv Maze, Larry Thompson, Joy Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Louisville Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2021cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jewell Carr
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Police Department, Joy L. William, Benjamin Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrianson #515702 v. Howard
as 1:2020cv00952
Respondent:
Jeremy Howard
Petitioner:
Joy Marie Adrianson #515702
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
