Cases 1 - 10 of 152
Caudill #479314 v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lee Caudill #479314
Defendant:
Unknown Morrow, Unknown Nevins and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolley v. Morrow et al
as 1:2024cv01039
Plaintiff:
Eric Jason Tolley
Defendant:
Morrow, Monroe Dodson, DeHoog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Oppy et al
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
David M Smith
Defendant:
Mr. J. Oppy, Mr. Chinn, Mr. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mellon v. Morrow
as 3:2023cv00430
Petitioner:
James A Mellon
Respondent:
Jim Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gresham #272603 v. Taylor et al
as 1:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
RESTRICTED FILER Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Jason Erway, Unknown Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cenneca Harmon v. Matthew Makepeace, et al
as 23-1522
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CENNECA DARRYL HARMON
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW WILLIAM MAKEPEACE, Wayne County Prosecutor, JOHN DOE, Detroit Police Officers, several unknown, ROBERTA C. ARCHER, 36th District Court Judge and others
Tripplet v. Knight et al
as 5:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
Louis A. Tripplet
Defendant:
David Knight and Sgt. David Morrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrow v. Tri County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jacob Andrew Morrow
Defendant:
Tri County Jail and Admin Springhetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Makepeace et al
as 4:2023cv10141
Plaintiff:
Cenneca Harmon
Defendant:
Matthew William Makepeace, John Doe, Roberta C. Archer and others
Richard Patton, Jr. v. Autumn Lawson, et al
as 22-5944
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD PATTON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AUTUMN LAWSON, Nurse, KATHY MIRACLE, Nurse, BRYAN MESSER, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
