Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Sinclair v. Louis et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Stephen Sinclair
Defendant:
Jeanssen Louis, Jason Porter, Ted Baltimore, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Bell County Forestry Camp et al
as 6:2024cv00036
Defendant:
Leamon Partin, Bell County Forestry Camp, Brandy Harm and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sam Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Martin v. Sinclair Community College, et al
as 17-3069
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM E. MARTIN
Defendant - Appellee:
SINCLAIR COMMUNITY COLLEGE, ACI REGIONAL SCHOOL PRINCIPAL, STEVEN JOHNSON and others
Martin v. Sinclair Community College et al
as 4:2016cv01074
Plaintiff:
William E. Martin
Defendant:
Sinclair Community College, ACI Regional School Principal, Steven Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sinclair v. USA
as 2:2016cv11000
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Durand Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Van Jenkins v. MDOC, et al
as 16-1080
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAROLE BOARD, ABSCONDER RECOVERY UNIT and others
Smith v. Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan et al
as 2:2015cv14026
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Bi-State Compact Commission, Illinois/Michigan, Interstate Commission on Adult Offenders Supervision, Hagerman and others
Hoard #250412 v. MacLaren
as 2:2014cv00239
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Sinclair Hoard #250412
Respondent:
Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Van Jenkins v. MDOC, et al
as 14-1675
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VAN JENKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PAROLE BOARD, ABSCONDER RECOVERY UNIT and others
Defendant:
PATRICK M. CLARK, Parole Agent, et al
Simmons v. Solozano et al
as 3:2014cv00354
Plaintiff:
James Simmons
Defendant:
Miquel Solozano, Clark Taylor, LaDonna Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
