Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17,060
David MacLloyd v. USA
as 24-1505
Petitioner: DAVID ERIKE MACLLOYD
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Kiptanui v. Governor of State of Ohio
as 24-3512
Petitioner: JAMES TANUI KIPTANUI
Respondent: GOVERNOR OF STATE OF OHIO
Taylor v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00994
Petitioner: Gabriel Lee Taylor
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bey v. Potton et al.
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff: Isaac Peterson Bey
Defendant: Charle Potton, Michael O'Malley, Cuyahoga County and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Starks v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00714
Petitioner: Calvin Starks
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Edenburn v. USA
as 4:2024cv11514
Petitioner: Ryan Neal Edenburn
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wilson v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00609
Petitioner: Roddrick Montez Wilson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Westerfield v. USA
as 1:2024cv00970
Petitioner: Jason Westerfield
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff: Montrail Forte
Defendant: North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curran v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2024cv00691
Petitioner: John F. Curran
Respondent: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?