Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Baker v. Blane et al
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sam Baker
Defendant:
Eve Blane, Norma Lay, Leamon Partin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wooten et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Angular Wooten and Leroy Wooten
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Damon T. Hininger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Bell County Forestry Camp et al
as 6:2024cv00036
Defendant:
Leamon Partin, Bell County Forestry Camp, Brandy Harm and others
Plaintiff:
Glenn Sam Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Demarco Wright
Defendant:
Director Annettee Chambers-Smith, Warden Kimberly Henderson, PREA Investigator Thomas Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bailey v. Vantell
as 1:2023cv01257
Petitioner:
Jamie Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Vance Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone et al v. Vantell et al
as 3:2023cv01255
Plaintiff:
Ja'Don Malone and Jason Young
Defendant:
Vance Vantell and CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kayla Massey v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al
as 23-5865
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAYLA MASSEY, as mother of J.L., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
CORECIVIC, INC., CORECIVIC OF TENNESSEE, LLC, DAMON T. HININGER and others
Vance v. USA
as 1:2023cv00091
Petitioner:
Jon Charles Vance
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Xavier Becton v. Vance Laughlin
as 23-5110
Petitioner / Appellant:
XAVIER BECTON, aka Abdul Akhir
Respondent / Appellee:
VANCE LAUGHLIN, Acting Warden
Talley-Ellis v. S.A.S Automotive Inc. ET. et al
as 2:2022cv12231
Plaintiff:
Wilshawn Talley-Ellis
Defendant:
S.A.S Automotive Inc. ET., S.A.S Security Inc. ET., William Hooks, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
