Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Wade v. Put-In-Bay Police Department, et al.
as 3:2024cv01158
Defendant:
Yuri Linetsky, Eric Seitz, David Fenstermaker and others
Plaintiff:
Dionte Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bredow v. Le et al
as 4:2024cv10979
Plaintiff:
Mark Wade Bredow
Defendant:
Le, Lindell, Shawn and others
Lee v. Perry et al
as 1:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee and Robert Wade Lee
Defendant:
Grady Perry, Amber Paden, CoreCivic/SCCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade #962146 v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wade #962146
Defendant:
Unknown Jones and Unknown Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Pounds
as 1:2023cv01220
Petitioner:
Johnny Lorenzo Wade
Respondent:
Zac Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Jones v. Kent County, MI, et al
as 23-1866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES JONES, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wade Jones
Defendant:
KENT COUNTY, MI, jointly and severally
Defendant / Appellant:
NURSE MELISSA FURNACE, jointly and severally, NURSE CHAD RICHARD GOETTERMAN, jointly and severally and NURSE JAMES AUGUST MOLLO, jointly and severally
Morgan v. Crickmer
as 5:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Arlus David Wade Morgan
Defendant:
Doug Crickmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. Crickmer
as 3:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Arlus David Wade Morgan
Defendant:
Doug Crickmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Luneke
as 1:2023cv01375
Petitioner:
Eugene Wade
Respondent:
Warden Doug Luneke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hineson v. Wade et al
as 3:2023cv00043
Plaintiff:
Wendy Hineson
Defendant:
Nathan Wade, Kelsie Torres and Amanda Durham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
