Cases 91 - 100 of 137
Austin et al v. Kasich et al
as 2:2012cv00983
Plaintiff:
Robert Austin
Defendant:
John Kasich, Gary Mohr, Andrew Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendricks et al v. Kasich et al
as 2:2012cv00729
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Hendricks and Robert Austin
Defendant:
John Kasich, Gary Mohr, Andrew Eddy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00025
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Strayhorn v. Caruso et al
as 2:2011cv15216
Plaintiff:
Leroy Strayhorn
Defendant:
Patricia Caruso, Karen Sue Malicoat, George Pramstaller and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
Rueben Herrerra, et al v. MDOC, et al
as 11-2128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUEBEN HERRERRA and RICO MENEFEE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES ARMSTRONG and others
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. KHAN
as 2:2011cv12695
Defendant:
MAQBULUR R KHAN
Plaintiff:
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Summers-Eskridge v. Kaschubeck et al
as 2:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
J Laverne Summers-Eskridge
Defendant:
John Kaschubeck , Mohamed H Abib , Muhammad N Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. Ballinger et al
as 2:2011cv12162
Plaintiff:
Lardell Bowman , LHB and April Parkhurst
Defendant:
Joseph Ballinger , Daniel Bozek , Michael Huddas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aetna Group USA, Inc. v. AIDCO International, Inc.
as 1:2011mc00023
Plaintiff:
Aetna Group USA, Inc.
Defendant:
AIDCO International, Inc.
Respondent:
Palligistics, LLC , NS Fund I, LLC and Salh F. Khan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
