Cases 101 - 110 of 681
Morris v. Bethard et al
as 2:2020cv06524
Defendant:
Fayette Co. Judge Steven Bethard, Matthew Wiedman and Darci Moore
Plaintiff:
Clifford D. Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson, et al. v. Cuyahoga County, et al.
as 1:2020cv02649
Defendant:
Randy Pritchett, Eric Ivey, Cuyahoga County and others
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Jackson and Phylllis Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Winebrenner Capital Management LLC v. Kraesig
as 3:2020cv00772
Plaintiff:
Winebrenner Capital Management LLC
Defendant:
Clifford Kraesig
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 138
McCulley v. Roger D Wilson Detention Facility
as 3:2020cv00472
Defendant:
Roger D Wilson Detention Facility
Plaintiff:
Clifford W McCulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Phillips v. Shastine Tangilag, et al
as 20-6248
Defendant / Appellee:
SHASTINE TANGILAG, MD, as Primary Care Physician, TED H. JEFFERSON, MD, as Consulting Physician, DR. ANGELA CLIFFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD R. PHILLIPS
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2020cv05611
Petitioner:
Clifford L. Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Donald Phillips v. Shastine Tangilag, et al
as 20-6226
Defendant / Appellee:
SHASTINE TANGILAG, MD, as Primary Care Physician, TED H. JEFFERSON, MD, as Consulting Physician, DR. ANGELA CLIFFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD R. PHILLIPS
The Estate of Nadine Stanley v. Cuyahoga County, et al.
as 1:2020cv02392
Defendant:
John Does and Jane Does (1-7), Cuyahoga County Jail, Cuyahoga County and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Nadine Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifford Houston v. USA
as 20-6136
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFFORD LEON HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Levinsky v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05120
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Clifford Levinsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
