Cases 111 - 120 of 160
Hawkins #205069 v. Grunst et al
as 2:2010cv00219
Plaintiff:
Cecil Hawkins #205069
Defendant:
David G. Grunst, Hannah J. Watson, Thomas M. Harp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv13091
Plaintiff:
Painters Union Deposit Fund
Defendant:
Innovative Ceilings & Walls, Inc. and David G Henwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mikko v. Smock et al
as 2:2010cv12845
Plaintiff:
Steven Mikko
Defendant:
Ted M Smock, Antoine S Fair and David G Berthiaume
Bolton et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02439
Plaintiff:
J. Scott Bolton , Erik G Brodin , David G Byrd and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc , James C. Kelsoe, Jr. , David H. Tannehill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00416
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Gary Hann v. State of Michigan, et al
as 10-1549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY S. HANN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD and others
Nenzoski v. Shewalter
as 5:2010cv00488
Petitioner:
David G. Nenzoski
Respondent:
Frank Shewalter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence Earl v. Kevin Ballew, et al
as 10-5052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE EARL
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN BALLEW, PHIL BREDESEN, DAVID MITCHELL and others
Krukemyer v. Forcum et al
as 3:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Krukemyer
Defendant:
James S. Forcum, David G. Jackson and State of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Bolton et al v. Morgan Asset Management, Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00001
Plaintiff:
J. Scott Bolton, J. Scott Bolton, J. Scott Bolton and others
Defendant:
Morgan Asset Management, Inc, Morgan Asset Management, Inc, Morgan Asset Management, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Petition for Removal: Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.