Cases 11 - 20 of 1,165
Grabenhorst v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv11782
Plaintiff:
Nathan Grabenhorst
Defendant:
Wyatt Peters, Carter May and Katherine Comstock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
May v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jerry May
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. doing business as Medtronic Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
May v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00396
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. doing business as Medtronic, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jerry May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Jerry Aldridge, et al v. Regions Bank
as 24-5603
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BROWN, MARGUERITE DUFFY, EDNA T. CALDWELL and others
Defendant:
REGIONS BANK
Davenport v. May et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Defendant:
Matthew Silver, Traci Canner, Alex Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Damon Davenport, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner, Jr. v. May
as 1:2024cv01113
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Warner, Jr.
Respondent:
Montana Attorney General and Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dotson v. May
as 1:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
David L. Dotson
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mai v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 5:2024rt55029
Defendant:
Bridgestone Corporation, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Michelin North America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Phuong Viet Mai
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Rose v. May
as 1:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
John R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pipkin v. Bonner et al
as 2:2024cv02426
Defendant:
Captain Johnson, Floyd Bonner, May Field and others
Plaintiff:
Byron Pipkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
