Cases 11 - 20 of 186
USA v. Gene Polk
as 23-1069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
GENE POLK
Jordan v. Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01198
Plaintiff:
Kara Jordan
Defendant:
Hyster-Yale Group, Inc. and Briggs Industrial Solution, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Diane Barrier Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gene Polk v. USA
as 22-1684
Petitioner / Appellant:
GENE POLK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richardson v. Polk
as 2:2022cv02465
Plaintiff:
Gordon Richardson
Defendant:
Letrone Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Marcus Polk v. Tony Parker, et al
as 22-5506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARCUS D. POLK
Defendant / Appellee:
TONY PARKER, TDOC Commissioner, in his individual capacity, RUBENARD RISPER, Chief of Security at Trousdale Turner Correctional Complex, in his individual and official capacity, YOLANDA PITTMAN, Associate Warden, in her individual and official capacity and others
Gary Accord v. Anderson County, TN, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY ACCORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDERSON COUNTY, TN, BEDFORD COUNTY, TN, BENTON COUNTY, TN and others
Polk v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01402
Plaintiff:
Sheila Polk
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burger v. Polk County, Tennessee et al
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jillian Burger
Defendant:
Polk County, Tennessee, Mark Von Roden, Stacy Weed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCord v. Sullivan County Correctional Facilty et al
as 2:2022mc00009
Plaintiff:
James C. McCord
Defendant:
Sullivan County Correctional Facilty, State of Tennessee, Polk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
