Cases 11 - 20 of 1,204
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bailey v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65396
Plaintiff:
Michele L. Bailey
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bailey v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2024cv10486
Petitioner:
Larry James Bailey
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Achs et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shawn Achs, Chad Purdon, Leah Purdon and others
Defendant:
3M Company, E.I. Dupont De NeMours and Company, The Chemours Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bailey v. Jones et al
as 0:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Scott Bailey
Defendant:
Brandon Jones, Nathan Conley and Wesley Coldiron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Tiffany Williams, Logan Edwards, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey Sr. v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Bailey Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Bailey et al.
as 5:2024cv00524
Plaintiff:
Darrell J. Smith
Defendant:
Sam Bailey, Holmes County Sheriff's Office Investigators, Jim Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Joshua Alan Bailey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
