Cases 11 - 20 of 1,676
Ahmad Hosseinipour v. Dallas Cook, et al
as 24-3334
Plaintiff:
AHMAD HOSSEINIPOUR
Defendant:
DALLAS COOK, NATASHA COOK and COITSVILLE, OH POLICE DEPARTMENT
Hemak v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2024cv10833
Plaintiff:
Debra Hemak
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lint Chiropractic, PC v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
as 2:2024cv10693
Plaintiff:
Lint Chiropractic, P.C. (Assignee of Nehemiah Cook) and Lint Chiropractic PC
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Roseman, Sr. v. Grant et al
as 2:2024cv10830
Plaintiff:
John L. Roseman, Sr.
Defendant:
Nanci J. Grant, Shalina D. Kumar, Nathan Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cook v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02264
Plaintiff:
Robert Cook
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Preston #235170 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Harvey Preston #235170
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Cook, Unknown Ryhdall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Burnett v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 24-1366
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANGELO BURNETT
Defendant:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of MDOC, in her official capacity, LIEUTENANT TAGGET, in individual capacity, LIEUTENANT BORIS, in individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
