Cases 11 - 20 of 308
Dawson v. Employees of Social Security Insurance Administration
as 3:2023cv01307
Plaintiff:
Travis Kenard Dawson
Defendant:
Employees of Social Security Insurance Administration and SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 6:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaver v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv12781
Plaintiff:
Dawson Douglas Shaver
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections
Shaver v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv12769
Plaintiff:
Dawson D. Shaver
Defendant:
Dr. Jones and Noah Nagy
Talley v. Dickson County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Shane Antonio Talley
Defendant:
Dickson County Jail, Officer Dawson Mathew and Dickson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery et al v. Kent County et al
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
Kellie Sinke, Deborah J. Parker, Peter Avery and others
Defendant:
Kent County, Peter MacGregor, Kenneth D. Parrish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Dawson v. City of Knoxville et al
as 3:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
Artaveus Dawson
Defendant:
City of Knoxville, Knoxville Police Department, Police Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv02671
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Trey Dawson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Donald Dawson-Durgan v. Tim Shoop
as 23-3610
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD DAWSON-DURGAN
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Wilson v. Mafnas et al
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
Lorenzoe Wilson
Defendant:
Sgt Edward Mafnas, Capt Sean Davis, Dawson Asher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
