Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Jennifer Kilnapp v. City of Cleveland, OH, et al
as 22-4059
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNIFER KILNAPP
Defendant:
CITY OF CLEVELAND, OH and DORNAT DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as City of Cleveland Chief of Police
Defendant / Appellant:
BAILEY GANNON, in his official and personal capcity
Keith DrummondIn re: Keith Drummond
as 22-3970
Petitioner:
In re: KEITH DRUMMOND
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pacheco v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv11927
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pacheco, Jeffrey King, Brian Sutton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kilnapp v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Kilnapp
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Dornat Drummond and Bailey Gannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drummond v. USA
as 2:2022cv02765
Petitioner:
Keith Drummond
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brittany Adkins, et al v. USA
as 22-5499
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRITTANY ADKINS, ANITA E. BARBOR, MELISSA A. BEARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Drummond v. Warden of USP McCreary et al
as 6:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Keith Drummond
Defendant:
Warden of USP McCreary, John and/or Jane Does and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Drummond v. Warden of U.S.P. McCreary et al
as 6:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Keith Drummond
Defendant:
Warden of U.S.P. McCreary and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Keith Drummond
as 21-3625
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEITH DRUMMOND
PNC Bank, National Association v. HD Audio/Video LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank and PNC Bank, National Association
Defendant:
rodney drummond, david hatton and HD Audio/Video LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
